Jose Antonio Alvarado v. State of Washington, Dept. of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPennell, J.
¶1 — This case turns on what type of evidence the Department of Licensing (DOL) must produce at a contested hearing in order to disqualify a commercial driver’s license (CDL) based on a positive drug test. Jose Alvarado argues that principles of statutory interpretation and the constitutional right of due process require that the DOL disclose the laboratory data used to generate a test result instead of merely the test’s conclusions. Finding no such requirement under either standard, we affirm Mr. Alvarado’s CDL disqualification.
FACTS
¶2 Jose Alvarado applied to work as a commercial driver for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southwick, Inc., V State Dept Of Licensing Business & Professions DivCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017