Legal Opinion

Jose Antonio Alvarado v. State of Washington, Dept. of Licensing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 5, 2016No. 33130-0-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPennell, J.

¶1 — This case turns on what type of evidence the Department of Licensing (DOL) must produce at a contested hearing in order to disqualify a commercial driver’s license (CDL) based on a positive drug test. Jose Alvarado argues that principles of statutory interpretation and the constitutional right of due process require that the DOL disclose the laboratory data used to generate a test result instead of merely the test’s conclusions. Finding no such requirement under either standard, we affirm Mr. Alvarado’s CDL disqualification.

FACTS

¶2 Jose Alvarado applied to work as a commercial driver for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. EngelWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southwick, Inc., V State Dept Of Licensing Business & Professions DivCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API