Legal Opinion

Department of Public Health v. Cumberland Cattle Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1972PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These four proceedings concern a diary farm owned by Cumberland Cattle Company (Cumberland) in North Attleborough (the town). In each proceeding, Cumberland is before us either by appeal or on a bill of exceptions, attempting to set aside a result adverse to it. Each proceeding is described in later paragraphs. The judge made findings adopted by him as reports of material facts in the equity suits, in which the evidence is reported.

Findings Relating to all Proceedings.

Certain findings (or facts appearing in bills of exceptions) relate to all the proceedings. With the exception of a contempt…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Root v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. United Factory Outlet, Inc. v. Jay's Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Cambridge Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API