Legal Opinion
Brownell v. Mercantile Trust Company
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 27, 1956No. 9590(3)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 F.Supp. 834 (1956)
Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Plaintiff,
v.
MERCANTILE TRUST COMPANY and Carl Robert Pommer, as successor trustees of trust agreement dated April 6, 1932, between Robert W. Pommer, donor, and Mercantile-Commerce Bank and Trust Company and Robert W. Pommer, trustees, as amended March 2, 1934, and April 29, 1938, and Carl Robert Pommer, Carlo Pommer and Alfred Pommer, individually and as representatives of a class, Defendants.
No. 9590(3).
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.
March 27,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lyter v. VestalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- McGrath v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- In re the Accounting of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Brownell v. LeutzDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- Bakewell v. Mercantile Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1957