Mahaney v. Union Inv. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Comanche County; F. E. Gillette, Judge. Action by the Union Investment Company against T. P. Mahaney. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
This is an action of replevin, originally brought by Union Investment Company, a corporation, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against T. P. Mahaney, plaintiff in error, defendant below, before a justice of the peace in Comanche county, to recover “one three year old brown horse mule, weight 900 pounds, valued at $80/’ in which plaintiff claims a special ownership and right of possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed September 9, 1904, by D. B. Denton to secure a loan of $107. There was judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff appealed; and on trial anew to a jury in the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Reynolds v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Livingston v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Carver v. KenyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Ball v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916