Legal Opinion

State v. Clonch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1955No. 289PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant presents for decision two assignments:

First, the one based upon exception to the refusal of the court to admit evidence relating to the issue of paternity. The exception is without merit! The judgment of the Recorder’s Court in this respect is res judicata. See S. v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 408, 72 S.E. 2d 857; also G.S. 49-7; S. v. Clement, 230 N.C. 614, 54 S.E. 2d 919.

And, second, the one based upon exception to the charge:

This exception is well taken. It would seem that the language used is too unequivocal. Ordinarily it is permissible for the court to charge that if the jury finds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. ClementSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Tidwell v. BookerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API