Tidwell v. Booker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the District Court erred in considering and making findings of fact and conclusions of law based upon defendant’s previous criminal conviction. Defendant, in support of his position, cites thé North Carolina rule that “ . . . evidence of a defendant’s conviction in a criminal prosecution for the very acts which constitute the basis of the liability sought to be established in a civil suit is not admissible unless such conviction is based on a plea of guilty.” Beanblossom v. Thomas, 266 N.C. 181, 185, 146 S.E. 2d 36 (1966). The rationale supporting…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Wells v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Woods v. RobbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Hussey v. CheekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976