Legal Opinion

State v. Brewer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is an appeal by the State from the judgment of the trial court sustaining a motion to quash an indictment for embezzlement, on the ground that the indictment is too vague, indefinite and general in its terms and does not give the defendant sufficient notice of the charge which he is called upon to answer, etc. Embezzlement is defined in our Statute, Shannon’s Code, Section 6576-, as follows:

“Any officer, agent, or clerk, of any incorporated company, or any clerk or agent of a co-partnership, or private person, except apprentices and other persons under the age of 18 years, who embezzles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Villines v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Wehunt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornberg v. E. T. & W. N. C. Motor Transp. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hobbs v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. LatimerTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API