Legal Opinion

Villines v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Criminal Court of Davidson County. J. M. Anderson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeaRd, J.

The plaintiff in error was a druggist, in Nashville, in this State. He was indicted for carrying on his business as such in violation of Sec. 1, Ch. 39, of the Acts of the Legislature of 1893, which, as far as it is necessary to set it out, is as follows: “Be it enacted,” etc., “That from and after the passage of this Act it shall be unlawful for any person, not a registered pharmacist, within the meaning of this Act, to open or conduct any pharmacy or retail drug or chemical store, as proprietor thereof, unless he shall have in his employ, and place in charge of such pharmacy or retail drug…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Griffin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McLean v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jordan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Knowling v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API