Legal Opinion

Denny v. Ross

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 13,910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; David M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

There is some question between counsel as to the nature of this case, the plaintiff in error claiming that it is one to revive a dormant judgment ; the defendant in error, that it is an action upon a dormant judgment.

The judgment was rendered May 19, 1879. It was properly kept alive by the issuance of executions until December 10, 1888, on which date an execution was issued. The next execution was issued December 13, 1893; the next February 10, 1899. This action was commenced December 4, 1899, which, as will be noted , is nine days less…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Henry v. McArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Dempsey v. Township of OswegoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  3. Ballinger v. James F. Redhead & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drew v. ThurlwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Dunn v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. First National Bank v. HarperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Newhouse v. HeilbrunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Jonsson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API