Town of Suffield v. Town of East Granby
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Application fco the Superior Court in Hartford County for the appointment of a committee of three to establish a disputed divisional line between the plaintiff and defendant towns, brought under Gen. Statutes, p. 88, sec. 8, which is given in full in the opinion. The committee was appointed, gave the notice required by the statute, heard the parties interested, fixed the divisional line and marked it by monuments, and made its report.
Read the full summary
Application fco the Superior Court in Hartford County for the appointment of a committee of three to establish a disputed divisional line between the plaintiff and defendant towns, brought under Gen. Statutes, p. 88, sec. 8, which is given in full in the opinion. The committee was appointed, gave the notice required by the statute, heard the parties interested, fixed the divisional line and marked it by monuments, and made its report. The defendant town remonstrated against the acceptance of the report, the principal allegations of the remonstrance being as follows: The defendant remonstrates…
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
This is a proceeding under the following statute; (Gen. Statutes, p. 88, sec. 3:) “ When the selectmen of adjoining towns * * * shall not agree as to the place of the divisional line between their respective communities, the Superior Court, upon the application of either, shall appoint a committee of three to fix said disputed line, and establish it by suitable monuments, and report their doings to said court; and when said report shall have been accepted by said court, and, together with the record of acceptance, shall have been lodged for record in the records of both the communities…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. Town of MonroeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Romanowski v. FoleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Carney v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896