Legal Opinion

Estate of Papineau v. All Other Persons Unknown Claiming Any Estate or Interest in or Lien or Encumbrance Upon the Property Described in the Petition or Against the Estate of Said

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1986No. Civ. 11231PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Daniel U. Papineau appeals from an order determining that minerals in North Dakota owned by Fred Papineau passed to his heirs by intestate succession and from an order denying Daniel’s motion to alter or amend the first order. We reverse and remand.

Fred died in the State of Washington in 1968. Daniel did not then probate a will purportedly executed by Fred in 1953 because the estate was not deemed valuable enough to make probate worthwhile. In 1984 Daniel attempted to establish ownership of the minerals through two wills, the 1953 will and another purportedly executed by Fred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sickler v. PopeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nelson v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Estate of Baur v. WestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. McManus v. CommowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of StantonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Matter of Estate of OttoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of Estate of OstbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Aune v. First National Bank & Trust of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sprague v. EvansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API