Legal Opinion

Hart v. Village of Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The Village of Clinton, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Oneida, -on the 27th day of .March, 1906, upon the verdict, of a jury for $3,000, and also from an .order entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day .of March, 1906, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes. 11

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The- plaintiff was employed by the defendant to aid in stringing wires for its electric lighting system. On the 30th of January, 1905, while on a. ladder engaged in this work, the ladder fell, precipitating him to the ground and inflicting injuries for which lie seeks to hold the defendant responsible.

The plaintiff and George E. Adams, who it is claimed by the plaintiff was the foreman having charge of the undertaking, were the only men on the day of the accident who were performing this particular work. The pole was in place and also a mast-arm, which was a hollow metal ■ tube…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Quigley v. . LeveringNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Hall v. United States Canning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. National Starch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. McMillan v. Minetto Shade Cloth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. McMillan v. Minetto Shade Cloth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. McKeon v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API