Legal Opinion

McKeon v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion on the minutes to set aside verdict for plaintiff and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an action uunder the employer’s liability provisions of the Labor Law (§§ 200-202, as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 352, and § 202-a added by the same act, which took effect Sept. 1,1910).

The accident took place on February 14, 1911.

The plaintiff at the time of the accident was a pipe-fitter in the employ .of the. defendant. He was injured while attempting to detach a “ T ” fitting from two pieces of pipe, *601screwed into the opposite ends thereof, by means of a pipe machine and a pair of chain tongs. The pipe machine was used to cut threads in pipe, and to cut off pipe, and it-could be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Sweeney v. . Berlin and Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Sanford v. Spivey ex rel. BateTennessee Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Schmitt v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiley v. . Solvay Process Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. McKeon v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Carlson v. MockWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API