Legal Opinion

Cape-France Enterprises v. Estate of Peed

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2001No. 99-518PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Cape-France Enterprises brought this action to rescind an agreement between the parties for the sale of a tract of land in Bozeman, Montana. On cross-motions for summary judgment the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Cape-France. The Estate of Lola Peed and Marthe Moore appeal from the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Cape-France. We affirm.

¶2 The dispositive issue on appeal is restated as follows:

¶3 Whether the District Court correctly concluded that the parties’ buy-sell agreement was unenforceable on the grounds of impossibility or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. PPL MONTANA, LLC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. L & C County v. WirthMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. LaFournaise v. Montana Developmental CenterMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Town of Clyde Park v. YounkinMontana Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API