Legal Opinion
Marine Office of America Corp. v. Lilac Marine Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided November 13, 2003No. CIV. 98-2359(GG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GIERBOLINI-ORTIZ, Senior District Judge.
Pending before this court is the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment. (Docket entries # 37, 43, 46, 47, 54 & 59).
BACKGROUND
This is an action in admiralty and a damaged cargo claim under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.C. § 1301, et seq. filed by Marine Office of America Corporation (“MOAC”), Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) and TradeArbed, Inc. (“TradeArbed”). The claim arises from a shipment of 8,678 bundles of reinforced steel bars…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Celta Agencies, Inc. v. Denizciliksanayi Ve Ticaaret, A.S.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Ben-Trei Fertilizer Co. v. Celtic Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010