Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Amato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 1, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

*802Claimant was employed as a forklift operator for three months when he moved in with his parents who lived 26 miles from his place of employment. He subsequently quit his job because he found the commute too onerous due to his lack of transportation. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KerrsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re the Claim of WorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of TolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API