Hasouris v. Sorour
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtWendlandt, J.
*607 We address, in the context of a civil action, whether a witness's deposition testimony can be used at trial under the prior recorded testimony exception to the rule against *608 hearsay where the witness is unavailable due to a valid invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination. We conclude that, as a general proposition, it can. In this case, however, we need not determine whether the witness validly invoked the privilege because the use of the witness's deposition testimony was permissible pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 32(a)(3)(D), 365 Mass. 787 (1974).
Background . We briefly summarize…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Thomas v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne Goodwin, Charles William Bullard and Grover Eugene BeaverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Beaupre v. Cliff Smith & AssociatesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019