Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fontanez

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 2019No. SJC 12469PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowy, J.

**22 The Commonwealth appeals from the judgment of a single justice of this court denying its petition for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The Commonwealth petitioned the single justice to vacate a Superior Court judge's order allowing the criminal defendant's motion in limine to exclude prior recorded testimony. The single justice denied the petition without a hearing, **23 stating, "This is not an exceptional circumstance requiring the exercise of the [c]ourt's extraordinary power, and in any event, the Commonwealth has not shown that the trial judge abused his discretion." We reverse.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Anthony Williams v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
  2. Ardaneh v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
  3. Ardaneh v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
  4. Berry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  5. Boone v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API