Legal Opinion

In re Jones

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 21, 1874No. Case No. 7,444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

At the hearing, the creditor, Mrs. Jones, offered her husband, David W. Jones, as a witness in her favor. He was objected to by the counsel for the assignee as incompetent,-and the court sustained the objection, following the construction given by the supreme court of this state to the statute relating to evidence. Farrell v. Ledwell, 21 Wis. 182.

The court there hold that the exclusion of husband .and wife as witnesses for each other in civil suits, is not based solely on interest, but rests upon principles of public policy, and as the statute only removes the ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westervelt v. . GreggNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Jaycox v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Farrell v. LedwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  4. White v. StaffordNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Methodist Episcopal Church v. JaquesNew York Court of Chancery · 1817

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fowle v. TorreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. The MelissaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API