Legal Opinion
Bertha Balark, and Cross-Appellant v. Michael Curtin, and Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1981No. 80-1956, 80-2327PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Bertha Balark is a judgment creditor of the defendants, six City of Chicago policemen. Plaintiff had previously prevailed on her civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to a stipulation reached at the close of trial.1 The district court entered judgment in favor of Balark *800based upon the terms of the stipulation. One year later, plaintiff returned to federal court to collect her judgment by garnishing the wages of the defendants. Fed.R.Civ.P. 69, 70. Defendants filed a motion to quash the garnishment proceeding which was denied by the district court.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Nazareth Gates v. John Collier, Superintendent of the Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bond v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Aetna Insurance Company v. PaddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Clarke v. BurkleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Argento v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Burke v. GuineyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Dotson v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Vukadinovich v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.