Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Savings Investment & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 16, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bodine, J.
The complainant, administratrix of Drusilla Jones, seeks to recover the balance due in a savings account in the name'of her intestate .in trust for Betty Harrigan. The court of chancery awarded the money to the administratrix, and in this there was no error.
The complainant’s proofs showed that on November 26th, 1928, Mrs. Jones withdrew $2,400 of her money from the Orange Savings Bank and opened the account in question in the Savings Investment and Trust Company of East Orange. The pass book evidences a trust for Betty Har rigan. Subsequently…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nicklas v. ParkerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hasbrouck v. Thayer MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Eisenhardt v. SchmidtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Howard Savings Institution v. QuatraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Zimmerman v. NauhauserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.