Legal Opinion
Carroline Webb v. MDOW Insurance Company and Croft Claimworks, LC
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 5, 2026No. 5:24-cv-00806Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CARROLINE WEBB, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-00806-JD ) MDOW INSURANCE COMPANY and ) CROFT CLAIMWORKS, LC, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Carroline Webb’s (“Plaintiff”) Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (“the Motion”). [Doc. No. 30]. Defendants MDOW Insurance Company (“MDOW”) and Croft Claimworks, LC (“Croft”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Response. [Doc. No. 41]. Plaintiff filed a Reply. [Doc. No. 42]. For the reasons outlined below, the Court denies the Motion. I. MATERIAL…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.