Legal Opinion
Burk v. Haney (In Re Haney)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided October 27, 1983No. 19-00434PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
L. CHANDLER WATSON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
Each of the above-styled adversary proceedings was commenced by the debtor’s former spouse to determine the discharge-ability of a debt alleged by the former spouse to be alimony and, therefore, nondis-chargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).
Findings of Fact
In the Haney proceeding a trial was held before the bankruptcy judge, without the intervention of a jury, from which the bankruptcy judge finds the facts to be as follows:
1. The debtor, Michael Haney, and the plaintiff, Sandra Haney Burk, were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Vande Zande v. Vande Zande (In Re Vande Zande)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- Voss v. Voss (In Re Voss)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1982
- Cartner v. Cartner (In Re Cartner)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holland v. Holland (In Re Holland)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1984
- Rhodes v. Rhodes (In Re Rhodes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1984
- Jacobs v. Zimberoff (In Re Zimberoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Brazier v. Brazier (In re Brazier)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
- Cochrun v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.