Burgess v. Consider H. Willett, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Latimer
Affirming.
The sole issue tere is whether or not a consent judgment in another action growing out of the same accident wherein appellee was the defendant, was admissible against appellee in this action, either as a judicial admission or as an estoppel to deny negligence.
Appellants were injured in an , accident involving the truck of appellee, a truck of the Milan Box Company, and the car in which appellants were riding. The accident occurred in the State of Tennessee on June 9, 1947. The car occupied by appellants was proceeding from Nashville to Memphis, Tennessee and was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sutherland v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- McArthur v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- H. A. Keach v. Roberta KeachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Whitney v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Powers' Administrator v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Welsh v. Gerber Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Taylor v. HawkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- McCallum v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Hill v. State Employees Retirement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.