Legal Opinion

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1993No. 93-50561, 93-50562Published

1Opinion of the Court

6 F.3d 561

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Stacey C. KOON, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Laurence M. POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 93-50561, 93-50562.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Order Filed Sept. 24, 1993.

As Amended Oct. 1, 1993.

Joel Levine, Encino, CA, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Stacey C. Koon.

William J. Kopeny, Santa Ana, CA, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Laurence M. Powell.

Steven D. Clymer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Reinhardt; Dissent · Kozinski.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Joseph DisommaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Efren Herrera-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Stacey C. Koon, United States of America v. Laurence M. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. DiSommaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API