Legal Opinion

United States v. DiSomma

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 1991No. SS 90 Cr. 428 (MGC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

On May 23, 1991, following an eight-week jury trial with six co-defendants, Joseph DiSomma was acquitted of mail fraud, RICO, and RICO conspiracy charges and convicted of one count of conspiracy to rob a jewelry store in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. I have denied DiSomma’s motion for a judgment of acquittal under Fed.R.Crim.P. 29, and he is awaiting sentence. DiSomma now seeks bail pending sentence or appeal under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3143 and 3145(c).

Section 3143 imposes stringent requirements for release pending sentence of persons…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph DisommaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Samantha Carr, Darlene Hunter, and Joseph RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Bao Deng ChenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. United States v. BloomerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1992
  5. United States v. RauschDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API