Legal Opinion
Association of Rural Residents v. Kitsap County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 2000No. 68027-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.
— Apple Tree Point Partners (Partners) asks this court to determine what land use regulations apply to the proposed development. We find that the former Kitsap County Zoning Ordinance applies because at the time in question the interim urban growth area (IUGA) had not been amended within the period of remand from the growth management hearings board (GMHB) and was therefore not in effect. As a result, land use permits were governed by preexisting zoning ordinances and not by the IUGA and Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. We affirm the Court of Appeals holding that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Assoc. of Rural Residents v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- City Of Issaquah, V. Westridge-issaquah Ii LpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GMHBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000