Legal Opinion

Galceran v. Noble

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Practice in the Superior Court. Interrogatories. Evidence. Promissory notes. Indorsement. Before Judge UNDERWOOD. Floyd Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Practice in the Superior Court. Interrogatories. Evidence. Promissory notes. Indorsement. Before Judge UNDERWOOD. Floyd Superior Court. September Adjourned Term, 1880. To the report contained in the decision, it is only necessary to add, in connection with the second division of the decision, that Noble was allowed to testify to statements made by the agent of the plaintiff in connection with the making of the note sued on, to the effect that he desired the trade of Payne, Graves & Co., and would take Noble’s note in payment for purchases made by them, and would look to him for payment.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

M. P. Galceran brought suit against the defendants in a justice court, on a note made by James Noble, Jr., as maker, and Payne, Graves & Co., as indorsers; note dated 31st November, 1865, and due one day after date, payable to Payne, Graves & Co., or order. An appeal was taken to the superior court. The defendants, Payne, Graves & Co., denied the indorsement, and if made, alleged it was made in blank, and was only for collection, and not to make themselves liable as indorsers. On the trial of the cause on the appeal, the jury, under the charge of the court and evidence…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeVaughn v. McLeroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Roberts v. CrowleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API