Legal Opinion
Homer v. Morris
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1984No. 18806PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
The plaintiffs, Jeffrey Homer and Robert Chavez, are inmates at the Utah State Prison. Their parole dates were revoked following a disciplinary hearing in'which the disciplinary committee determined that the plaintiffs had participated in the stabbing of a fellow inmate.
On appeal from the district court’s denial of their petitions for writs of habeas corpus, the plaintiffs claim that the hearing was invalid because: (1) written notice of the acts with which they were charged was inadequate; (2) no evidence existed of an unidentified informant’s reliability; (3) their request…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nevin Mawhinney v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Peter Preiser, Commissioner of Corrections, and Norris, LieutenantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Petersen v. Utah Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.