In Re Jackson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
We granted a hearing to determine whether either federal or state due process requires state prison hearing officers to interview confidential informants in camera before finding an accused prison inmate guilty of a disciplinary violation solely on the basis of confidential information.
Prison officials regularly depend on confidential informants to identify prison rule violators. While stressing the paramount need to rely on such informants as a source of information, these officials stress an equal need to maintain confidential the identity of those informants: to do…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Coniglio v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- In Re RothwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.