Legal Opinion

Gellis v. Claremont Masonic Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The contract declared on was one of ordinary letting. There was no express warranty of the suitableness of the premises for the purpose for which they were let, and none is to be implied. In such a case the rule is that the lessee takes the risk of the quality of the premises and cannot recover for any injury arising from defects therein. The sole exception to the rule is where the damage results from a secret defect, and there is such a concealment thereof by the landlord as to amount to fraud or deceit. To state a cause of action under this exception the declaration must aver that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Baitzel v. RhinelanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dargue v. ChaputNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  3. American Marine Upholstery Co. v. MinskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Soresi v. RepettiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API