Hertzler v. Manshum
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.
This is the second appearance of this case in this court. When first reviewed, the verdict for defendants was set aside and a new trial granted (228 Mich. 416). A second trial has been had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant Manshum and in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant Hanchett, in the sum of $5,063. This latter judgment is here reviewed by writ of error.
Plaintiff was permitted to offer proof that Minnie Blomley, a resident of the city, had purchased a sack of “Pride of the Valley” flour from a merchant named Elenbaas about the 20th day of April,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Ensign v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Doherty v. Township of Grosse IsleMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Harrington v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Hovey v. General Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paull v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1935