Legal Opinion

Hertzler v. Manshum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. When first reviewed, the verdict for defendants was set aside and a new trial granted (228 Mich. 416). A second trial has been had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant Manshum and in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant Hanchett, in the sum of $5,063. This latter judgment is here reviewed by writ of error.

Plaintiff was permitted to offer proof that Minnie Blomley, a resident of the city, had purchased a sack of “Pride of the Valley” flour from a merchant named Elenbaas about the 20th day of April,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ensign v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Doherty v. Township of Grosse IsleMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Harrington v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hovey v. General Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paull v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API