Legal Opinion

Paull v. McBride

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 38,392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Pauli was injured while attempting to rescue his mother from a fire caused by an explosion of contaminated kerosene. A carload containing 8,115 gallons of illuminating oil, vaporizing at 131 degrees, and belonging to defendant Cities Service Oil Company at Grand Rapids, was approved by the deputy oil inspector March 8, 1933. Act No. 328, § 28, Pub. Acts 1931, prohibits the sale of kerosene that will emit a combustible vapor at a temperature of 120 degrees or less Fahrenheit. March 24th, Whittall and Schwab pur chased 146 gallons of kerosene from Cities Service Oil Company delivering…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smolenski v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Peplinski v. KleinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wabeke v. BullMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API