Legal Opinion

CURRY v. DELBALSO

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02535Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REGINALD CURRY Petitioner, v. THERESA DELBALSO, et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2535 Respondents. ORDER Reginald Curry filed a pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arguing that his constitutional rights were violated when he pleaded guilty and was sentenced in Pennsylvania state court for multiple counts of robbery. The petition was referred to Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, who issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) that the petition be denied. Petitioner has filed objections to the R&R.1 As set forth in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Matthew Becker v. Secretary Pennsylvania DepartmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API