Legal Opinion
Rogers v. City of Richmond
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 23, 2012No. Civil Action No. 3:11CV620-HEHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge.
This action for unpaid overtime compensation is presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties have submitted detailed memoranda in support of their respective positions, and the Commonwealth of Virginia (“the Commonwealth”) has filed an intervenor’s brief in opposition. The Court heard argument on March 20, 2012. For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this case are current and former law-enforcement officers (“Plaintiffs” or “the Officers”) of the City…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carazani v. ZegarraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hatcher v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
- Sarrazin v. Coastal, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014