United States v. Ivhan Herrera-Chiang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Ivhan Herrera-Chiang (“Herrera”) appeals his convictions for three counts of bribery. He contends that the district court committed reversible error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1) by impermissibly participating in plea negotiations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal.
I. Standard of Review
Because Herrera did not raise his Rule 11 argument before the district court, our review of that argument is for plain error. See United States v. Kyle, 734 F.3d 956, 962-63 (9th Cir.2013) (assuming without deciding that plain error review applies to unpreserved…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. James Edwards AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Francisco Alonso Portillo-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.