Legal Opinion

United States v. Ivhan Herrera-Chiang

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2015No. 13-10607Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Ivhan Herrera-Chiang (“Herrera”) appeals his convictions for three counts of bribery. He contends that the district court committed reversible error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1) by impermissibly participating in plea negotiations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal.

I. Standard of Review

Because Herrera did not raise his Rule 11 argument before the district court, our review of that argument is for plain error. See United States v. Kyle, 734 F.3d 956, 962-63 (9th Cir.2013) (assuming without deciding that plain error review applies to unpreserved…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. James Edwards AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Francisco Alonso Portillo-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API