Meyer Bros. v. Lane
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. BepleviN, by Lane against Meyer Bros, and others. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the January term, 1887. The defendants bring the case to this court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*492The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoetoN, C. J.:
Tins was an action commenced by Daniel Lane against Meyer Bros., S. C. Lang & Co., et al., to obtain possession of a stock of drugs and fixtures valued at $1,000. An affidavit was filed by Geo. S. Chase, the attorney of Lane, and an order of delivery obtained, and the property turned over to him. Meyer Bros, et al. filed a motion to set aside the order of delivery upon the ground that the affidavit did not state that the plaintiff was the owner of the property, and entitled to its immediate possession. The affidavit was defective, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Batchelor v. WalburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- McDonald v. GauntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Burton v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Paul v. HodgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Commercial State Bank v. KetchamNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Tooele Meat & Storage Co. v. Eite Candy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- Kent Oil Co. v. WaddillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.