Legal Opinion

Shabaz v. Henn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1934No. 23259PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

On September 8, 1931, the plaintiff filed attachment and garnishment proceedings, and a garnishment summons was then served on the garnishee. No bond to dissolve the *442garnishment appears to have been given. Upon a traverse of the garnishee’s answer the court rendered a judgment on April 8, 1932, that the “garnishee was at the time of the service of the summons of garnishment in possession of a certain Ford automobile truck, which was sold on September 21, 1931, for the sum of $300, the truck thus being converted into money,” and that the plaintiff recover this amount less $52.15 allowed for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Covington v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Philmon v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morris W. Haft & Bros. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  2. Rea v. Motors Ins. CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Aiken v. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Allen v. Atlanta Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Kendrix v. Superior Egg Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API