Legal Opinion

State Farm Ins. Companies v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1990No. 552PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The order which is now before this Court for review directed Donna Hunt, the appellant, to submit to a physical examination pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.1

The statute, at 75 Pa.C.S. § 1796, authorizes a court to require a claimant to submit to a mental or physical examination by a physician upon a showing of good cause whenever the mental or physical condition of the claimant is relevant to the claim.2 The requirement of good cause *623entails more than relevancy. It means that the reasons alleged in a petition must rise to a level of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ZacharySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Keystone Insurance v. CaputoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SwantnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Brownell v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Fleming v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Olsofsky v. Progressive Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001
  5. Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API