Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Culberson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 2023No. 3ag/22Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Wendy Barrow Culberson, AG No. 3, September Term, 2022, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT Respondent Wendy Barrow Culberson violated the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4 (Communication), 1.5(a) (Fees), 1.7 (Conflict of Interest— General Rule), 1.15(a) (Safekeeping Property), 8.1(a) (Bar Admissions and Disciplinary Matters), and 8.4(a)–(d) (Misconduct), and Maryland Rule 19-407(a)(2)–(4) (Attorney Trust Account Record-Keeping). During a period spanning several years, Ms. Culberson misappropriated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API