Legal Opinion
Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 19, 2024No. 5:20-cv-09341Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-09341-EJD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. 14 DEMARAY LLC, Re: ECF Nos. 431, 452 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) has moved for 18 summary judgment that Applied’s Cirrus and Avenir Chambers (the “Accused Chambers”) do not 19 infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,544,276 (“’276 Patent”) and 7,381,657 (“’657 Patent”) (together, the 20 “Asserted Patents”) based on claim and issue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.