Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hale

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Lincoln: J. C. Fullerton, Judge. Suit by B. F. Jones against U. G. Hale, The Toledo Coal Company, C. B. Crosno, Milton Hale, Coll VanCleve, L. E. Blain and Geo. Landis, sheriff. There was a decree for plaintiff, from which U. G. Hale, The Toledo Coal Company and Milton Hale appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The object of this suit is to have declared null and void a deed from the plaintiff of certain lands in Lin-,con County to the defendant corporation, the Toledo Coal Company, on the ground that such corporation was not a competent grantee to receive title, or, failing in this, to have the sheriff of Lincoln County enjoined from executing to defendant U. H. Hale a deed to such lands in pursuance of the purchase thereof made by him at a sale under a decree foreclosing a mortgage thereon in his favor, executed by the defendant ■corporation, on the ground that defendant M. Hale, ■one of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Beach v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Marsters v. Umpqua Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Stanley v. LuseOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Saylor v. Commonwealth Banking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Glaser v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API