Legal Opinion

Ramsay v. Retirement Board

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 26, 2017No. 20150574-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

¶1 Lori Ramsay and Dan Smalling seek judicial review of the Utah State Retirement Board’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the Kane County Human Resource Special Service District, which operates the Kane County Hospital. Ramsay and Smalling contend that the board erred in granting summary judgment because the equitable discovery rule tolled the applicable statute of limitations. We uphold the board’s decision.

BACKGROUND 1

¶2 In 1993, the special service district, acting as a subdivision of the state of Utah, established a defined contribution program for its employees.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Berneau v. MartinoUtah Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ostler v. Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. Sevastopoulos v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API