Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Messenger, Clerk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 1591PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Mandamus by the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company against E. F. Messenger, as clerk of the district conrt of Hughes county, and others.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In an action tried in the district court of Hughes county, wherein J. B. Bagwell was plaintiff and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company defendant, judgment was rendered against said defendant. A motion for new trial having been made, overruled, and exceptions saved, time was granted in which to make, serve, and have settled a ease-made. Such case-made, being signed and settled,' was attested by the clerk, and filed with the papers in the case. Plaintiff through its attorney of record making demand upon the clerk for said! case-made in order that it might be attached to the petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri & Kansas Transportation Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Divine v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. George v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Ferguson v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Creek Realty Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API