Legal Opinion
Dye v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 11, 1952No. Civ. A. 1998, 1999, 2054PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.
The three actions above numbered were tried together to the Court without a jury under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b).
Each is brought by the widow, as Ad-ministratrix, to recover for the alleged wrongful death of Charles R. Dye in Action 1998, James Otto Dye in 1999 and Glenn G. King in Action No. 2054.
The ¡actions, as originally filed, alleged that the decedent’s death in each case, resulted from the action of the United States Coast Guard and the United States Corps of Engineers, in maintaining and operating Dam No. 41 in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Beasley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1951
- Skeels v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1947
- Claypool v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Chesley v. MesquiteDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023