Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge M. SMITH.
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The Government’s Motion to Clarify Decision is granted as follows. On page 5 of the slip opinion, filed on March 27, 2015, the text of footnote 1 is amended as follows: “Because the IJ deemed Maldonado credible, we take his testimony as true for purposes of this opinion. See, e.g., Singh v. Holder, 764 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2014).”
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
OPINION
Roberto Curinsita Maldonado (“Maldonado”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Delphine Arrey v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Pavittar Singh v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lucero Xochihua-Jaimes v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Daya Singh v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.