Legal Opinion · Dissent

Iberville Trust Savings Bk. v. City Caf&200

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1933No. 1207Published

1DissentElliott, Judge

The facts of this ease are as stated in the opinion of the majority of the court. The plaintiff bank cashed a check for the City Café and now finds it necessary to proceed against the maker and indorsers to recover the amount. In a former appeal, acting on the same petition, the court held affirming the judgment of the lower court that the petition, as against City Café, disclosed no cause of action. The case was returned to the lower court, whereupon the plaintiff bank filed an amended and supplemental petition in which it avers:

“Now your petitioner shows that by answer filed herein on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. v. DorsettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Lauterbach v. SeikmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Cassard v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Peretz v. PeretzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1811

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API