People v. Carrasco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*717Opinion
MANELLA, J.
INTRODUCTION
In a case of first impression, we hold that where a defendant commits multiple acts of vandalism pursuant to a single general impulse, intention or plan, the fact that the damage is to property owned by more than one victim does not preclude aggregation resulting in an offense of felony vandalism.
Appellant challenges a jury verdict finding him guilty of felony vandalism. He does not deny that when his mother refused him entry to a house in which she was temporarily residing, he threw a statue through the front window of the house and thereafter broke the windows…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. MosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. EbnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re David D.California Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KirvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. SalmorinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Anastasiou CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Le CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.