Long v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Concurrence
Littleton, Judge:
I concur in all the reasons given and the conclusions reached in the foregoing dissenting opinion and believe that they are fully sustained by the cases of United States v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, 486, 487; Ryan et al v. Carter et al, 93 U. S. 78, 84; Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co., 93 U. S. 634, 638; United States v. Moore, 95 *555U. S. 760, 763; United States v. Saunders, 120 U. S. 126, 129; United States v. Jones, 131 U. S. 1-14, 16-19; United States v. Chase, 135 U. S. 255, 258; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644, 650; Holy Trinity v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.