Hanscom v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Report. The case is stated in the opinion. Non-occupancy: R. S., c. 49, § 20 ; White v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 83 Maine, 279, Id. 85 Maine, 97; Lanoy v. Home Ins. Co., 84 Maine, 492; 1 May, Ins. § 249, A; Bonenfantr. Ins. Co., 76 Mich. 654; Ashworth v. Builders Ins. Co., 112 Mass. 422; Keith v. Mutual Ins. Co., 10 Allen 228; Hermann v. Adriatic Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 162; Kimball v. Monarch Ins.
Read the full summary
On Report. The case is stated in the opinion. Non-occupancy: R. S., c. 49, § 20 ; White v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 83 Maine, 279, Id. 85 Maine, 97; Lanoy v. Home Ins. Co., 84 Maine, 492; 1 May, Ins. § 249, A; Bonenfantr. Ins. Co., 76 Mich. 654; Ashworth v. Builders Ins. Co., 112 Mass. 422; Keith v. Mutual Ins. Co., 10 Allen 228; Hermann v. Adriatic Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 162; Kimball v. Monarch Ins. Co., 70 la. 513; American Ins Co. v. Padfield, 78 111. 167; Corrigan v. Conn, Fire Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 298; Moore v. Ins. Co., 64 N. H. 140; Sonnebom v. Ins. Co., 44 N. J. 220; Fehse v. Council Bluffs Ins.…
1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.
These actions were brought on two policies of insurance against loss or damage by fire, issued to the plaintiff by the defendant companies respectively. The two cases were heard together and come to the law court on a report of the evidence relating to both claims. The aggregate amount of insurance effected in the two companies on the plaintiff’s farm buildings and certain personal property, was $5500. Of this amount $3000 was on the buildings, $1500 on the household furniture, $500 on vehicles, etc., and $500 on horses. It is stipulated in the report that if the defendants are found liable,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Trippe v. Provident Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Gans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Webster v. Phœnix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weininger v. Metropolitan Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Webster v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Hoover v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Thielbar Realties, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.